<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>CKB Talk Radar Daily Brief</title>
  <link>https://chainte.github.io/ckb-talk-radar/</link>
  <description>Daily Nervos Talk community briefing and latest active topics.</description>
  <language>zh-cn</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:01:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <atom:link href="https://chainte.github.io/ckb-talk-radar/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
  <item>
    <title>CKB Talk Daily Brief - 2026-04-29</title>
    <link>https://chainte.github.io/ckb-talk-radar/</link>
    <guid>tag:ckb-talk-radar,2026-04-29:daily-brief</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>## 今日发生了什么 论坛今天整体节奏偏技术向，核心亮点是 CKB-VM 安全基础设施和 Spark 资助项目的推进。[S01, S02, S03, S04, S05, S06, S07] 一则 CKB-VM 差分测试框架的开发者日志更新，引发了关于形式化验证提案是否适配星火计划资助范围的讨论；[S01, S02, S03] 同时多个入选项目继续提交周报或状态更新，社区在测试网众筹和 AI 开发者工具两条线上也有新动作。[S05, S06, S07] ## 重点话题 **CKB-VM 安全基建双线并进**：开发者 CKBdev 更新了 ckb-vm 差分测试框架的实现进展，为后续优化和架构变更提供验证基础；[S01] 另一边，社区成员提交了一份基于 Sail 规范 + Coq 定理证明器的 CKB-VM 形式化验证提案，但星火计划委员会成员指出该项目已超出 Spark"低门槛、快节奏"的资助范围，建议调整后再正式评审。[S02, S03] **星火资助项目状态更新**：Dular 项目（Fiber + RUSD/UDT + 东非在地试点）被标记为 Pending，委员会要求补充 Daraja 生产环境凭据的可视化证据，并修正 CKB 发放与汇率折算的表述；[S04] Nervos Brain 发布第七周周报，聚焦工具闭环与评测基线，[S06] 计划本周拉 Telegram 试用群供委员会提前体验。[S06, S07] **测试网众筹平台实现全自动交割**：CKB Kickstarter 的自动清算机器人已在测试网完成端到端验证，平台目前可在测试网上实现"创建→...</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>TeamCKB Dev Log (Updated: Apr 29, 2026) (1 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/teamckb-dev-log-updated-apr-29-2026/8572</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/teamckb-dev-log-updated-apr-29-2026/8572#recent-1</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Updates Features Differential Testing Framework for ckb-vm Implemented a differential test framework for ckb-vm. This provides a stronger foundation for validating optimizations and future architecture changes: GitHub - yuqiliu617/ckb-vm-contrib at differential-test · GitHub CKB DAO Treasury Design &amp; Voting Research research on the CKB DAO Treasury design and voting settlement, with multiple directions under active discussion: Option 1: DAO-Bound Voting with Off-Chain State Explores a governance model where voting power is bound to Nervos DAO deposits, while proposal state, voting records, and tally data are maintained off-chain and committed on-chain through verifiable state roots. This...</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Spark Program | CKB-VM Sail Formal Verification — Proving CKB-VM RISC-V Instruction Equivalence via Sail Specification and Coq Theorem Prover / CKB-VM Sail 形式化验证 — 基于 Sail 规范与 Coq 定理证明器的 CKB-VM RISC-V 指令等价性证明 (2 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/spark-program-ckb-vm-sail-formal-verification-proving-ckb-vm-risc-v-instruction-equivalence-via-sail-specification-and-coq-theorem-prover-ckb-vm-sail-sail-coq-ckb-vm-risc-v/10214</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/spark-program-ckb-vm-sail-formal-verification-proving-ckb-vm-risc-v-instruction-equivalence-via-sail-specification-and-coq-theorem-prover-ckb-vm-sail-sail-coq-ckb-vm-risc-v/10214#recent-2</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>This looks like a valuable direction. A further verified CKB-VM foundation would strengthen the whole CKB scripting stack. Proving instruction-level equivalence against the Sail RISC-V specification feels like the kind of deep infrastructure work that may not be immediately visible to application developers, but i reckon it compounds over time. Best of luck. @TinyuengKwan 你好，感谢提交 ckb-vm-sail-verify 的提案。这个方向非常关键：CKB-VM 是 CKB 的执行层安全基石，而你提出的 “Sail（官方规范）+ Coq（形式化证明）+ 差分测试（工程验证）” 的双轨方案，也能看出你在 Sail/ACT 生态中有相对稀缺的一手经验与工程积累。 需要说明的是，该项目已明显超出星火计划的支持范围（以 低门槛、快节奏 的方式帮助社区开发者启动小型原型项目）。如果你仍希望向委员会正式递交该项目，那么在提交委员会正式评审前，我个人建议你按 Spark 的预审要求补充/澄清以下几点信息，让评审能更快收敛到“本期资助是什么、怎么验收、验收失败影响什么”。 1) 验证方案（How to...</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Spark Program | Dular (1 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/spark-program-dular/10212</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/spark-program-dular/10212#recent-1</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>@duongja 你好，感谢你提交 Dular 项目提案，并根据预审建议补充了 How to Verify、预算拆分与风险说明等内容。整体方向（Fiber + RUSD/UDT + 真实在地试点）很契合 Spark 对“可落地、可验证”的资助导向。 本项目当前状态暂定为 Pending，并非否定项目价值，而是表示：在进入下次正式评审/投票前，我们还需要你补齐两类“可验证凭据”，并纠正提案中关于 CKB 发放与汇率折算机制的表述，以避免后续沟通成本与验收争议。 1) 请补充：Daraja 生产环境凭据的可视化证据。 你已声明持有 STK Push + B2C 生产凭据，请通过私信发我一张 Daraja Developer Portal 的后台截图（API Key 字段可全部打码，但需保留 Production 环境标识、App 名称、创建时间）。这一步用于委员会内部尽调，不会公开。委员会在验证后，会在本帖中发布一条信息，说明已经核验。 2) 请补充：现有 multi-hop RUSD payment 的可核验证据。 为了让委员会/社区能低成本持续复核你的技术交付（而不是只在结项时“补材料”），请在主楼直接给出对应的 Fiber payment hash 或相关 CKB testnet tx hash，并简要说明 Fiber payment hash 与 CKB L1 explorer 的对应关系（避免读者误以为每笔 Fiber 支付都能在 CKB explorer 直查）。 3) 关于 CKB 发放与汇率风险：请修正提案中的流程假设，并按 Spark 口径重写 你在提案的...</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Introducing CKB Kickstarter: Decentralized All-or-Nothing Crowdfunding on Nervos CKB (Testnet MVP Live) (1 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/introducing-ckb-kickstarter-decentralized-all-or-nothing-crowdfunding-on-nervos-ckb-testnet-mvp-live/10130</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/introducing-ckb-kickstarter-decentralized-all-or-nothing-crowdfunding-on-nervos-ckb-testnet-mvp-live/10130#recent-1</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Update: Automatic Finalization Bot live on testnet Following up on the v1.1 update above: the bot is deployed and end-to-end verified on testnet as of yesterday (2026-04-27). The platform is now fully trustless on testnet, campaigns flow create → pledge → deadline → distribution with zero manual intervention from anyone (creator, backer, or platform operator). What the bot does (each polling cycle, every 10s): Detects expired campaigns still in Active status → submits permissionless finalizeCampaign tx (Success if total pledged ≥ goal, Failed otherwise) For finalized Success campaigns with remaining live pledge cells → submits permissionlessRelease tx (funds → creator) For finalized...</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Spark Program | Nervos Brain - A Global Developer Onboarding Engine and Cross-Language Hub Powered by Agentic RAG (3 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/spark-program-nervos-brain-a-global-developer-onboarding-engine-and-cross-language-hub-powered-by-agentic-rag/9995</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/spark-program-nervos-brain-a-global-developer-onboarding-engine-and-cross-language-hub-powered-by-agentic-rag/9995#recent-3</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>第七周周报 一、本周目标（工具闭环与评测基线周） 本周承接第六周“多轮可持续交互”阶段的工作，重点从“机制已经具备”推进到“关键路径真正闭环、且后续可以被稳定评测”。核心目标有四个： 继续治理运行时日志噪音，补齐最小可观测性闭环。 让 discourse_query / github_search 从协议层定义走到图执行主路径可调用。 建立第一版多轮评测集，为后续 benchmark 和量化回归提供统一输入。 补齐 Telegram / Discord 两端在长消息与异常路径下的稳定性回归。 二、本周完成 日志治理与诊断视图补齐 已对常见第三方库日志进行了统一降噪处理，补充了 quiet_loggers 与 third_party_level 控制项，降低了测试和运行期的无关日志干扰。同时把工具执行过程的摘要信息接入到图状态与 trace_summary 中，使得一次回答至少可以追踪到“执行了哪些 tool、各自成功/为空/失败”的最小诊断视图，而不再只能看到最终回答文本。 工具执行闭环推进到运行时主路径 本周把 discourse_query 与 github_search 从“schema 已存在但主路径未接通”的状态推进到了可被 RetrieverPlanner -&gt; RetrievalExecutor -&gt; ToolRuntime 实际调用的状态。具体包括： RetrieverPlanner 归一化阶段已允许这两个 tool 保留，不再强制回退到 qdrant_search。 ToolRuntime 为二者补齐了 handler。 handler...</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Discontinuation of the DAO v1.1 project (1 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/discontinuation-of-the-dao-v1-1-project/10204</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/discontinuation-of-the-dao-v1-1-project/10204#recent-1</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>In consideration of Terry’s advice, the following updates are provided regarding the closure of DAO v1.1: Payment: The proposal team will retain the payment corresponding to the already‑delivered Milestone 1. Code: The code will remain open source and is accessible at this repository. A total of eight repositories encompass all code for the DAO v1.1 platform (excluding Web5 services, which are available here). Additionally, the community may access the open‑source vote auditor tool here. Contract: The voting contract deployed on the mainnet has been terminated, whereas the testnet voting contract continues to operate. The did:ckb contracts remain active on both the mainnet and the...</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Cellora — designing a production indexing and query service for CKB (feedback welcome) (1 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/cellora-designing-a-production-indexing-and-query-service-for-ckb-feedback-welcome/10199</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/cellora-designing-a-production-indexing-and-query-service-for-ckb-feedback-welcome/10199#recent-1</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Just came across this thread and found it interesting, so I’ll try to offer a few suggestions. I think the honest answer is: For tx inclusion proofs, the practical first step is likely not Flyclient, but exposing CKB’s existing get_transaction_proof / verify_transaction_proof path through Cellora. That lets clients verify that a transaction is committed under a particular block header, rather than merely trusting Cellora’s indexed result. This easily moves Cellora from a purely trusted indexer toward an inclusion-verifiable indexer. For full historical / chain-tip trust minimisation, my narrower point is that I’m not sure there is a canonical Rust/TS wallet-side verifier package that app...</description>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
