<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>CKB Talk Radar Daily Brief</title>
  <link>https://chainte.github.io/ckb-talk-radar/</link>
  <description>Daily Nervos Talk community briefing and latest active topics.</description>
  <language>zh-cn</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 18:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <atom:link href="https://chainte.github.io/ckb-talk-radar/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
  <item>
    <title>CKB Talk Daily Brief - 2026-05-12</title>
    <link>https://chainte.github.io/ckb-talk-radar/</link>
    <guid>tag:ckb-talk-radar,2026-05-11:daily-brief</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 18:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>## 今日发生了什么 Nervos Talk 今天最热闹的讨论集中在协议金库（treasury）该不该立刻启动，以及如何启动 [S01, S05]。社区成员 jimi-winehouse 主张直接以中心化方式快速激活金库，把资源投放到高影响力项目上，不需要花一年时间去搞去中心化治理 [S05]；而 matt_ckb 则强调必须遵循定位文件（positioning paper）所代表的"社会契约"，这是网络参与者早已达成的共识 [S01, S06]。与此同时，几个 Grant 项目也在持续推进，包括 Spark Program 旗下的 Nervos Brain 和 Tiko 都发布了最新进展 [S07, S08]。 ## 重点话题 **协议金库激活路线之争愈加热烈**：jimi-winehouse 质疑所谓"社会契约"是否存在、是否是 2019 年的老文件在绑架当下决策 [S02]；Yeti 贴出了 RFC 0001 定位文件的链接和 4.6 Treasury 章节原文，证明金库机制确实白纸黑字写在协议定位里 [S03, S04]。matt_ckb 后续将相关讨论拆分成了独立话题帖 [S11]。 **"原生稳定币"讨论出现分歧**：matt_ckb 认为运营稳定币和维护公共基础设施难以两全，且链上已有 USDI [S12]；yifenzi 则强烈主张基于 CKB/Fiber 做超额抵押稳定币，并详细描述了用 CCC 工具发币、UTXOSwap 建池的多签实施方案 [S13, S17]。双方对"native"一词的理解似乎存在翻译层面的偏差 [S15]。 **Pocket...</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Discussion about an alternative to the protocol treasury (11 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/discussion-about-an-alternative-to-the-protocol-treasury/10246</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/discussion-about-an-alternative-to-the-protocol-treasury/10246#recent-11</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 18:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>jimi-winehouse: Is the positioning paper a bible I wasn’t aware of? it is a social contract. Ultimately it is up to the participants in the network to activate it, however it needs to be built to fulfill the social contract that’s been created, this is just the nature of doing something without a central party in charge. Documents such as the positioning paper do take on a certain higher quality like what you refer to. In this way, participants (new and old) can know what they are getting into, without putting any trust in anyone else. It sounds like an appeal to authority, and a centralized one with the way you’re unwilling to discuss and provide good arguments for. Where is this “social...</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Spark Program | Nervos Brain - A Global Developer Onboarding Engine and Cross-Language Hub Powered by Agentic RAG (1 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/spark-program-nervos-brain-a-global-developer-onboarding-engine-and-cross-language-hub-powered-by-agentic-rag/9995</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/spark-program-nervos-brain-a-global-developer-onboarding-engine-and-cross-language-hub-powered-by-agentic-rag/9995#recent-1</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 18:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>回顾近期的 bad case，主要原因是 prompt 设置过于保守：一方面表现为对用户频繁追问，另一方面是查资料不够积极。此外，上周的数据库问题也是因模型未触发多库联合调用引起的。总体来看，系统并没有严重的设计或架构问题，后续优化 prompt 和调用逻辑即可解决。</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Spark Program | Tiko Creator Commerce Expansion + Private Beta Validation (1 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/spark-program-tiko-creator-commerce-expansion-private-beta-validation/10231</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/spark-program-tiko-creator-commerce-expansion-private-beta-validation/10231#recent-1</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 17:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Updated. I narrowed the supported scope from 7 categories to the first 3 categories: Digital drops, Memberships/passes, and Limited editions/collectibles. I also added a detailed How to Verify section, including: access to the live test environment verification steps and pass/fail criteria for each supported feature evidence publication locations the private beta verification loop, including participant source, task design, metrics, feedback collection, and final report format Modified sections: Section 3: Project Description Section 5: Expected Deliverables Section 7: Clear To-Do List Section 8: User Testing Plan Section 9: Required Funding Section 10: Funding Breakdown Section 14:...</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>[DIS] Bitcoin Renegade CKB Media Campaign (2 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/dis-bitcoin-renegade-ckb-media-campaign/10239</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/dis-bitcoin-renegade-ckb-media-campaign/10239#recent-2</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 17:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Yes I am withdrawing my proposal and putting in a new one As you fine tune your proposal with the plenty of feedback/suggestions from Nervos community, I do support your campaign and comical endeavors at live events which turn heads toward the Nervos booth, and so your knowledge base and personality can benefit the community.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Pre-RFC Discussion: Activating the Nervos DAO Treasury (1 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/pre-rfc-discussion-activating-the-nervos-dao-treasury/10143</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/pre-rfc-discussion-activating-the-nervos-dao-treasury/10143#recent-1</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 16:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>12 posts were split to a new topic: Discussion about an alternative to the protocol treasury</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>再谈CKB/Fiber支撑的原生稳定币的必要性和紧迫性 (17 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/ckb-fiber/10240</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/ckb-fiber/10240#recent-17</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 11:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Anything built on Fiber is built on CKB. There is already USDI but it is not mentioned ————————————————- ”One can not serve two masters” Operating a stablecoin (especially one that would be competitive against giants like USDC) and maintaining public infrastructure are two very different tasks. 希望你能表现出哪怕有一点点的专业性 一个Usdc本尊其价值都极小 更别说一个模仿的小小版Usdc 现在Uddc/Usdt的没进入是其自身的选择不是想进入被你们拒绝，你先搞清楚这个基本事实，不要一遍又一遍的让人笑话 而Dai的模仿者Rusd是一个很好的说明对象，但这个交易对流量池不应该由普通用户来建立也不应该有单独的盈利点存在，而需要在一个代币创建之初就考虑进去，更多的说明去看我已经发布的信息 我认为理解这个没有什么难度，需要做的只是有勇气面对它:放弃那份不该被独占的利益 一个是中心化的，一个是去中心化的 一个是已有巨大影响力的，一个是需要很多人共用建立影响力的 这是肯定会一直存在的对立而又统一的两面，我们总会来到这样的路口然后需要做出自己的选择 那些选择中心化的，选择已有巨大影响力的，没问题，因为总有人选择去中心化选择很多人一起共同建立影响力的路...</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>[DIS] Mobile-Ready CKB Light Client (Pocket Node) for Android (2 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/dis-mobile-ready-ckb-light-client-pocket-node-for-android/9879</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/dis-mobile-ready-ckb-light-client-pocket-node-for-android/9879#recent-2</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 07:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Hi @zz_tovarishch it’s close to a month, M4 currently in the pipeline and M3 haven’t been cleared. Is there a reason for the delay? 已经多次提醒committee打款，但目前尚未得到回复 请耐心等待，有消息会及时同步</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Is there any good reason for allowing hidden profiles? (3 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/is-there-any-good-reason-for-allowing-hidden-profiles/10243</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/is-there-any-good-reason-for-allowing-hidden-profiles/10243#recent-3</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 05:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Just found this in the profile settings, I didn’t even realise it was an option to turn on and off. I agree, there doesn’t seem to be any obvious reason this should be allowed and I can’t think of why a legit user would even want to do this. I thought for a second that maybe it could be used to make anonymous posts if you changed your name and hid the profile, but I’m assuming the details of this post would come back when you unhid the profile again. But this brings up another question and I don’t want to derail your thread here, but I wonder if there should be an easy option for (clearly labelled) anonymous posting? There’s certain topics (I’m not talking about anything in particular )...</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>CKB Ecosystem Biweekly Update (1 posts)</title>
    <link>https://talk.nervos.org/t/ckb-ecosystem-biweekly-update/9821</link>
    <guid>https://talk.nervos.org/t/ckb-ecosystem-biweekly-update/9821#recent-1</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 02:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>image1200×675 67.1 KB CKB Ecosystem Biweekly Update #16 Welcome to the latest CKB Ecosystem Biweekly Update. Here’s a quick summary of key dev and ecosystem progress from the past two weeks. Infrastructure &amp; Tooling @CKBdev improved CKB-VM ARM64 performance, added SKILL.md for AI agents in ckb-debugger, and upgraded toolchain to 1.95.0. Multiple DAO Treasury designs &amp; voting directions under discussion. More: CKB Dev Log 2026-04-29 @CKBDevrel published an investigation into the AI optimization plan, and is working on an RGB++ asset manager with the new SDK. @FiberDevs released Fiber v0.8.1, added the x402 facilitator MVP, and attended Bitcoin 2026 (Las Vegas). More: Fiber Dev Log...</description>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
